The legislative bills signed into law to protect women who seek American spouses through mail order magazines, and to regulate illegal actions of international marriage brokers have had the effect of delaying processing of spousal visas in order to investigate possible abuse and fraud in immigration laws. However, the effect is too broad sweeping and affects a wide range of nations that have no history, or propensity for the type of adverse behavior the laws and regulations are trying to prevent.
For example, in the Western New York South Asian community individuals utilize its own family network to search for spouses that are suitable in terms relative wealth, social standing, religious beliefs, education, etc. and in most situations the males and females prefer not to leave their home countries, but do so for a higher quality of life for future generations. Furthermore in addition to receiving 50% of the asset should the marriage break up, the female is paid a huge lump sum payment which is valued at 150% of total assets. Religious and cultural beliefs have been built in to protect against domestic violence. It seems self evident that no male living in the United States would abuse his wife if he had to give up 50% of his assets, and a prenuptial dollar amount equal to 150% of the value of his total assets, Contrary to certain prejudicial beliefs, South Asian and Muslim men do not abuse their wives. The decision to engage in a martial relationship takes through and careful planning that is decided upon by the individuals involved and the families. The community in question shuns domestic violence as it against their religion, and does not believe in match making services, and views match making services, and mail order brides as immoral. Based on local experiences and reported practices most South Asian /Muslim females who receive their green cards do not divorce their husbands, and/or not abused.
South Asians have a right to practice their religious beliefs, and bring over their spouses in a process that is fair and equitable for all parties involved. The process should be transparent, efficient, equitable, and less costly to the taxpayers of the United States. The current system of application processing, lacks efficiency and increases the risks of adverse selection.
The system needs to be restructured to reduce costs. Management outsourcing, investigation and processing services, reduce processing time, and make the overall process fair, equitable, and safe for all citizens involved. K-1 visas need to be eliminated and consolidated into one
family visa. Processing centers should be restructured and consolidated into one large center that would eliminate overhead and nonessential operating costs. Fixed and variable costs associated with operating multiple centers would be eliminated, and a portion of the savings would be allocated toward the creation of immigration advocacy centers to be housed in community centers of major metropolitan areas in all 50 states. The centers would hire staff with a private investigator and use the criminal justice system and or law enforcement to help clients fill out forms, conduct interviews, collect facts, and determine if the case should be accepted or denied. If accepted the paper work should be forwarded to the processing center for a final review, with subsequent mailing of the official paper work. If it is denied the client should be informed of the reasons for the denial, and offered the right to appeal based on prescribed grounds.